| 张永江,宋西茹.网络时代刑法解释论的现实抉择、挑战及其应对[J].,2020,(5):73-81 |
| 网络时代刑法解释论的现实抉择、挑战及其应对 |
| The Realistic Choice, Challenge and Response to Criminal Law Interpretation in the Internet Era |
| 投稿时间：2020-10-02 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 客观解释论 扩张化趋势 约束要素 |
| English Keywords:objective interpretation expansionary trend constraint factors ( |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 506 |
| 全文下载次数: 273 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 法律的滞后性与社会的多变性决定了刑法客观解释论是我国应对网络犯罪理论与实践做出的双重选择。但不可否认的是,当前网络时代刑法客观解释论存在明显的扩张化趋势,并不断冲击着罪刑法定原则的底线。“主观的客观解释论”名义上是以主观性来纠偏过度的客观性,但实则为主观解释论的翻版,并不可取。从恪守罪刑法定原则、克服刑法滞后性的角度来看,在坚持刑法客观解释论的前提下,为刑法客观解释的扩张化设定刑法用语的可能含义、刑法体系解释规则及罪名规范保护目的三大约束要素,从而将其限定在罪刑法定原则的框架下是更为妥当的选择。 |
| English Summary: |
| The hysteresis of law and the variability of society have determined that the objective interpretation of criminal law is the dual choice of China's theory and practice in dealing with cybercrime. However, it cannot be denied that there is an obvious trend of expansion of the objective interpretation theory of criminal law in the current Internet era, and it constantly impacts the bottom line of the principle of legality of crime and punishment. The “subjective and objective interpretation theory” is nominally to correct excessive objectivity by subjectivity, but it is actually a reproduction of subjective interpretation theory which is not desirable. From the perspective of abiding by the principle of legality of crime and overcoming the lag of criminal law, on the premise of adhering to the objective interpretation of criminal law, it is a more appropriate choice to set up three constraint factors for the expansion of the objective interpretation of criminal law, thus limiting it to the framework of the principle of legality of crime and punishment, namely, the possible meanings of criminal law terms, the interpretation rules of the criminal law system and the purpose of protection of the criminal law norms. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|