| 赵东.犯罪客体争议再辨析[J].,2013,14(6):97-101 |
| 犯罪客体争议再辨析 |
| On the Differentiation and Analysis of the Criminal Object |
| 投稿时间：2013-10-08 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 犯罪客体 犯罪构成 犯罪概念 司法意义 |
| English Keywords:criminal object crime constitution concept of crimes judicial meaning |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 966 |
| 全文下载次数: 1348 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 犯罪客体是我国及前苏联犯罪构成理论中特有的要件，随着我国学者学术视野的开阔，学术思维的国际化，对于传统的犯罪客体要件的争议日益激烈，犯罪客体这一抽象的要件在犯罪构成中到底应不应该存在？怎样存在？在犯罪构成中的地位如何？要对犯罪客体给出一个合理的定位，对犯罪客体不能是简单的肯定或者否定，而是根据犯罪概念和犯罪构成之间的关系，确定立法意义的“犯罪构成”和“司法意义”的犯罪构成，在不同层次上去确定犯罪客体在犯罪构成中的不同地位，才是解决问题的关键所在。 |
| English Summary: |
| Criminal object is a special aspect of the crime constitution theory in China and former Soviet Union. With scholars’ ever-expanding academic horizon and the internationalized academic thoughts, fiercer dispute on the traditional criminal object was on, such as the necessity of the criminal object, its existing manner, its status and so on. Criminal object is given a reasonable orientation. It is not simply to say yes or no to the criminal object, but to determine the crime constitution of the legislative and judicial meaning. Based on this, the different status of the criminal object in crime constitution will be ensured on different levels, which should be the key to solving all the disputes. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |