肖贵, 罗成翼①.论形式自由与实际自由的二分——托克维尔、马克思、雷蒙·阿隆自由观比较[J].,2012,13(5):35-38
论形式自由与实际自由的二分——托克维尔、马克思、雷蒙·阿隆自由观比较
On Formal Freedom and Actual Freedom
投稿时间:2012-09-13  
DOI:
中文关键词:  形式自由  实际自由  托克维尔  马克思  雷蒙·阿隆
English Keywords:formal freedom  actual freedom  Tocqueville  Marx  Raymond Aron
Fund Project:
作者单位
肖贵, 罗成翼① 南华大学 政治与公共管理学院湖南 衡阳 421001 
摘要点击次数: 1300
全文下载次数: 1357
中文摘要:
      雷蒙·阿隆对自由概念的划分标志着人类对于自由问题认识的深化。其中形式自由中仍然涵盖了之前康德思辨自由概念注重形式合法性的因素,而实际自由则是在此基础上对自由问题的一种升华与现实化、具体化,马克思的贡献就在于沿着托克维尔这种现实化、具体化的方向走到了极致。而雷蒙·阿隆相比于马克思则又表现出了向传统自由观回归的明确倾向。与托克维尔相比,他的自由观中有了更多的现实主义考虑,而不再局限于像传统哲学那样将自由的所谓先天形式置于绝对优先的地位。
English Summary:
      The division made by Raymond Aron towards the concept of freedom marks human's further understanding of the freedom problem. Between the two freedom forms, the formal freedom still covers the factors of Kant’s speculative free concept which pay attention to the form legality, while the actual freedom is based on this and give a sublimation and actualization to the problem of freedom, and what the contribution of Marx’s is that he went to the extreme along the direction of actualization, and crystallization proposed by Tocqueville. However, compared to Marx, Raymond Aron shows a clear tendency toward the regression of traditional freedom views. Compared with Tocqueville, Raymond Aron’s view of freedom has more realistic consideration, and is not confined to the traditional philosophy any longer which puts the so-called innate form into the absolute priority status.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭