| 马柳颖.设立民事举证时限制度的初步思考[J].南华大学学报(自然科学版),1998,(2):.[.Initial Thoughts on Founding Civil Proof Time Limit Institution[J].Journal of University of South China(Science and Technology),1998,(2):.] |
| 设立民事举证时限制度的初步思考 |
| Initial Thoughts on Founding Civil Proof Time Limit Institution |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 举证制度,举证时限,法律观念障碍,法律后果,庭前准备程序 |
| 英文关键词:proof raising institution,proof raising time limit,obstruction of statutory ideas,legal results,prepare court order before hearing |
| 基金项目: |
| 马柳颖 |
| 中南工学院计算机系!衡阳421001 |
| 摘要点击次数: 809 |
| 全文下载次数: 2 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 现行民事举证制度采取证据随时提出主义．它破坏了法院公正、中立形象，违背了两审终审、诉讼公正、效益原则．应从立法上对现行的举证制度予以完善，设立举证时限．规定逾期举证则要承担败诉和诉讼损失的法律后果．民事举证时限制度的设立和落实．必须破除传统的法律观念障碍、改革庭前准备程序、建立证据交换制度或设立审前预备庭程序． |
| 英文摘要: |
| In the present civil proof institution, the doctrine of giving a proof is taken atany time. This institution spoils the image of court justice and neutrality and violates thesystem of thc court of second instance being the court of last instance, lawsuit justice andlawsuit beneflclal result. Therefore, we should improve the exlsting proof time limit institution and stipulate that those who do not give a proof in time should bcar the legal resultsof losing a lawsult or loss of lawsuit. only by gett1ng rid of the obstruction of traditionalstatutory ideas, reforming pritrial procedures and founding an institution of exchangingproofs or preparing court order before hearing can we establish a civil proof time Iimit institution and carry it out. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|