| 李鸿君,洪磊,刘丹,万立松,丁锐.风险分析指数对大隐静脉曲张手术老年患者预后的影响.[J].中南医学科学杂志.,2024,(6):915-917, 937. |
| 风险分析指数对大隐静脉曲张手术老年患者预后的影响 |
| The influence of risk analysis index on the prognosis of elderly patients with varicose great saphenous vein surgery |
| 投稿时间：2024-03-06 修订日期：2024-08-20 |
| DOI：10.15972/j.cnki.43-1509/r.2024.06.009 |
| 中文关键词: 风险分析指数 老年 大隐静脉曲张 手术治疗 预后 |
| 英文关键词:risk analysis index surgical treatment varicose great saphenous vein old age prognosis |
| 基金项目:安徽省自然科学基金(2208085MH199)；“科大新医学”联合基金(WK9110000187) 作者简介:李鸿君,硕士,副主任医师,研究方向为老年下肢血管疾病诊治,E-mail为lhjun84613@163.com。通信作者丁锐,主任医师,研究方向为血管疾病诊断和治疗,E-mail为hj838288@163.com。 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 140 |
| 全文下载次数: 42 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的探讨风险分析指数(risk analysis index,RAI)对大隐静脉曲张手术老年患者预后的影响。 方法收集大隐静脉曲张老年患者196例,分为建模组(n＝137)和验证组(n＝59)；建模组根据预后分为预后不良组(n＝22)和预后良好组(n＝115)。比较患者患肢临床表现-病因学-解剖学-病理生理学(CEAP)临床分级、静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)、静脉节段性疾病评分(VSDS)和RAI得分。分析大隐静脉曲张老年患者预后不良的影响因素,以及RAI得分对患者预后不良的预测价值。 结果预后良好组和预后不良组CEAP分级比较差异有显著性(P＜0.05),预后不良组VCSS评分、VSDS评分和RAI评分均高于预后良好组(P＜0.05)。CEAP分级、合并糖尿病、VCSS、VSDS、RAI是大隐静脉曲张老年患者预后不良的影响因素(P＜0.05)。建模组RAI和预测模型、验证组RAI和预测模型均对患者预后具有良好的预测意义(P＜0.05)。 结论RAI评分是大隐静脉曲张老年患者预后不良的影响因素,据此建立的预测模型对患者预后有较好的预测价值。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| AimTo investigate the influence of risk analysis index (RAI) on the prognosis of elderly patients with varicose great saphenous vein surgery. MethodsA total of 196 elderly patients with great saphenous varicose veins were collected and divided into modeling group (n＝137) and verification group (n＝59). According to the prognosis, the modeling group patients were divided into poor prognosis group (n＝22) and good prognosis group (n＝115). The clinical manifestations-etiology-anatomy-case physiology (CEAP) clinical classification, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), venous segmental disease score (VSDS) and RAI score of the affected limbs were compared. The influencing factors of poor prognosis in elderly patients with varicose great saphenous vein, and the predictive value of RAI score for poor prognosis, were analyzed. ResultsThere was a significant difference in CEAP grading between the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group (P＜0.05), that the VCSS score, VSDS score, and RAI score in the poor prognosis group were higher than those in the good prognosis group (P＜0.05). CEAP grade, diabetes, VCSS, VSDS and RAI were the influencing factors for poor prognosis of elderly patients with varicose great saphenous vein (P＜0.05). The modeling group RAI and prediction model, validation group RAI and prediction model all have good predictive significance for patient prognosis (P＜0.05). ConclusionRAI score is the influencing factor for poor prognosis in elderly patients with varicose great saphenous vein. The prediction model established on this basis has a good predictive value for the prognosis of patients. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|