| 伍岳，杨彪，刘海兵，李磊，张中强，汤亮.固定平台和活动平台在双侧膝关节置换术中的系统评价.[J].中南医学科学杂志.,2014,42(4):393-395. |
| 固定平台和活动平台在双侧膝关节置换术中的系统评价 |
| Comparison of Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing in Bilateral Total Knee Replacement： a Systematic Review |
| 投稿时间：2014-03-24 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 全膝关节置换 固定平台 活动平台 Meta分析 |
| 英文关键词:total knee replacement fixed-bearing prosthesis mobile-bearing prosthesis Meta |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 997 |
| 全文下载次数: 1161 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的应用Cochrane系统评价的方法评价在全膝关节置换术中选择固定平台或活动平台的疗效。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of total knee replacement performed with fixed-bearing or mobile-bearing prosthesis by the theory of Cochrane systematic review.MethodAll trials comparing fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prosthesis in total knee replacement were retrieved and included.We assessed the risk of bias and the quality of the trials,extracted the relevant data and performed a Meta-analysis.ResultSeven trials were suitable.The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between two groups in reoperation rate，rang of motion，knee score，radiolucent lines and patients satisfaction.The better knee function score was in fixed-bearing group,but there was no clinical significance.ConclusionThis study shows no significant difference between two prosthesis in total knee replacement.More high quality randomized controlled trials were required to verify this claim. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |