周君,何红晨,肖登,陈世菊,刘慧芳,覃渝茜,何成奇.脉冲电磁场联合电针疗法对去卵巢大鼠骨质疏松的影响.[J].中南医学科学杂志.,2014,42(4):331-335.
脉冲电磁场联合电针疗法对去卵巢大鼠骨质疏松的影响
Effects of Combination Treatment with Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields and Electroacupuncture on Ovariectomy-induced Osteoporosis in Rats
投稿时间:2013-11-11  
DOI:
中文关键词:  骨质疏松  骨密度  生物力学  脉冲电磁场  电针  联合治疗
英文关键词:osteoporosis  bone mineral density  bone biomechanical properties  pulsed electromagnetic fields  electroacupuncture  combination treatment
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(81171865),湖南省卫生厅资助项目(B2014-052).
作者单位
周君1,2,何红晨2,肖登2,陈世菊2,刘慧芳2,覃渝茜2,何成奇2 1.南华大学附属第一医院康复科湖南 衡阳4210012.四川大学华西医院康复科 康复医学四川省重点实验室 
摘要点击次数: 769
全文下载次数: 1234
中文摘要:
      目的探索脉冲电磁场联合电针疗法对去卵巢大鼠骨质疏松的影响。方法将50只SD雌性大鼠随机分为假手术组、去势组、脉冲电磁场组、电针组和联合组,每组10只。除假手术组外,各组大鼠行双侧卵巢切除术,假手术组大鼠只切除卵巢周围与卵巢大小相仿的脂肪组织。去除卵巢术后1周,假手术组和去势组不作任何干预,脉冲电磁场组给予脉冲电磁场治疗、电针组给予电针治疗,联合组同时给予脉冲电磁场和电针治疗。干预12周后处死实验动物,取左股骨和L5椎体进行骨密度检测及生物力学检测;取左胫骨观察组织形态学变化。
英文摘要:
      ObjectiveTo explore whether combination treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) and electroacupuncture (EA) have additive benefits on bone mineral density(BMD) and biomechanical properties in OVX rats.MethodsFifty 3-month old female Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to one of five groups:sham-operated control (Sham),ovariectomy (OVX),ovariectomy with PEMFs treatment (PEMFs),ovariectomy with EA treatment (EA),and ovariectomy with PEMFs+EA treatment (PEMFs+EA).After 12-week treatments,bone mineral density,histomorphometric parameters,and bone biomechanical properties were examined.ResultsPEMFs,EA and combination treatment significantly increased BMD of the femur (P<0.01,P<0.05) compared to OVX group.There was no significant difference in the femur BMD among the five groups(P>0.05).PEMFs,EA and combination treatment significantly increased BMD of L5 vertebral body (P<0.01) compared to OVX group.Whats more,combination treatment with PEMFs and EA was more effective than PEMFs or EA alone for improving BMD in L5 vertebral body(P<0.05).The biomechanical three-point bending experiment showed that PEMFs and combination treatment significantly increased maximum load in the left femur compared to OVX group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in maximum load of the left femur among the five groups(P>0.05).The compression test showed that PEMFs,EA and combination treatment significantly increased maximum load (P<0.01) and energy to failure (P<0.01) in L5 vertebral body compared to OVX group.Whats more,combination treatment was more effective than PEMFs or EA alone for improving maximum load (P<0.05,P<0.01) and energy to failure (P<0.01) in L5 vertebral body.ConclusionsCombination treatment with PEMFs and EA have additive benefits on BMD and bone biomechanical properties in the lumbar vertebral body.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=970261AF74811A5D7478F0024925E9FDF931F370D3C87E87326C76362D54EE7AA5204A8533F1962FE06AC14AD48C346E67F67A8CF96904A15FC637C457E975F4178D9EE8C4C849A8015929567F06D457FBCA401651236F461AC1C0C7E40129A7D2AAEF4DF549BEB675074F779F01FCC3B563937B94D7A7E98366C954A7ACCEDB92A0D5A23C8C1288&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=BB33F1C95224820A&jid=6A20DF2A798996E24F064D5ECF83A153&yid=9EAD63ADE6B277ED&aid=0BBE966F242DBF83F3630DC2287C87ED&vid=&iid=E158A972A605785F&sid=717CC18E05F2AFA0&eid=B66C5792F4740920&fileno=20140402&flag=1&is_more=0">