| 曾德辉，陈辉.股骨近端锁定板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较.[J].中南医学科学杂志.,2011,39(4):438-440. |
| 股骨近端锁定板与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的比较 |
| A Comparative Study of Proximal Femoral Locking Plate and Dynamic Hip Screw in Treatment of Intertrochanteric of Femur |
| 投稿时间：2011-04-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 股骨粗隆间骨折 内固定 动力髋螺钉 锁定板 |
| 英文关键词:intertrochanteric fracture of femur internal fixation dynamic hip screw locking plate |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1063 |
| 全文下载次数: 853 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的比较股骨近端锁定板与DHS治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效。方法2008年7月～2010年9月手术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折120例，其中采用DHS 68例，股骨近端锁定板52例。从手术时间、出血量、临床愈合时间、术后髋关节功能恢复情况及并发症等方面进行比较。结果经术后3～24个月随访，股骨近端锁定板优秀率明显高于DHS组，两组比较差异有显著性（P<0.05）。结论股骨近端锁定板是理想的股骨粗隆间骨折内固定物之一。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of interocha-nteric fractures of the femur using either the proximal femoral locking plate or dynamic hip screw.Methods120 cases of interocha-nteric fratures of the femur from July 2008 to September 2010 were divided into two groups,proximal femoral locking plate group with 52 cases and DHS group with 68 cases.The clinical therapy on the following aspects:median operation time;bloodloss,healing time,function rehabilitation of hip joint and complication were compared,and the collected data were analyzed statistically.ResultThe superiorityrate of proximal femoral locking plate group was more than that of DHS group.The data from above aspects had significant difference(P<0.05).ConclusionProximal femoral locking plate was a good internal fixationin operation of intertrochanteric fracture of femur. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |