| 刘志文,李解方,丁平,许良余.PKRP和TURP治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效观察.[J].中南医学科学杂志.,2005,(2):216-218. |
| PKRP和TURP治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效观察 |
| A Comparative Study on the Effect of PKRP and TURP for the Treatment of BPH |
| 修订日期：2004-11-25 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 前列腺增生症 经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术 经尿道前列腺电切术 |
| 英文关键词:benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH),transurethal plasma kinetic resection of th-e prostate(PKRP),transurethal resection of the prostate(TURP) |
| 基金项目: |
| 刘志文 李解方 丁平 许良余 |
南华大学第一附属医院 湖南衡阳421001
(刘志文，李解方，丁平)
，南华大学第一附属医院 湖南衡阳421001(许良余)
|
| 摘要点击次数: 884 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 比较经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(PKRP)与经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗前列腺增生症(BPH)的临床疗效。方法 PKRP术治疗BPH 6 0例,TURP术治疗BPH 6 0例,对两种术式的临床效果进行比较。结果 两组患者在手术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS) ,生活质量评分(QOL)、平均尿流率(AFR)较术前均得到显著改善(P <0 .0 1)。PKRP组在手术时间,术中失血量,术后留尿管时间,术后住院时间,暂时性尿失禁发生率均明显少于TURP组(P <0 .0 5 ) ,未发生电切综合征(TURS)。结论 PKRP比TURP并发症更少,恢复更快,更安全,是经尿道治疗BPH的理想方法之一。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To compare the clinic efficacy of operation of transurethal plasma kinetic resection of prostate(PKRP) with TURP for BPH. Methods To review and compare the clinic efficacy of 60 patients with BPH treated by PKRP and 60 patients treated by TURP. Results IPSS,QOL, AFR were significantly improved after both of procedures(P<0.01).Compared with TURP,PKRP seemed to be less in operative duration, operative bleedin-g, postoperative cathete-rization,the time of postoperative hospitalization and temporary urin-ary incontinence(P<0.05).No TURS occurred in PKRP. Conclusions PKRP is less compli-cation,more safety and more quickly recovering than TURP,which is one of the recommen-ded methods for the treatment of BPH |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|