| With the arrival of the information age, the application of artificial intelligence technology in the field of social governance is more and more wide, and its application trend in the judicial field is also universal.However, due to the immaturity of technology and the inherent characteristics of the intelligent court, it has exposed a range of risks. For example, the labor intelligence judgment focuses on efficiency rather than justice,which makes the trial result biased,and the non-literacy of the program code makes the judgment process of the intelligent courts opaque, artificial intelligence assisted trial is difficult to deal with disputes involving moral and value consolidations, different technical standards lead to doubts about the data involved, and system vulnerabilities lead to information disclosure.As the concrete embodiment of China's “comprehensively promoting digital construction and driving modernization” in the judicial field, the intelligent court not only provides convenience for the parties,but also solves the contradiction of many cases and few people.It shows great enthusiasm from the official policy to judicial practice.Facing the existing risks, judges should face up to the instrumental attributes of the intelligent court in the trial process, controlling the judicial boundary of AI, selectively apply the intelligent court system to deal with cases according to the nature and difficulty of the case, actively feed back the technical defects, and respond to the needs of the times for the modernization of the trial system and trial ability by promoting the deep application of artificial intelligence technology in the judicial field. |