| 李望平,何枕沄.“结构—信念”互构视角下中国放射性废物治理筹资的行动逻辑与优化路径研究[J].,2026,(1):1-9 |
| “结构—信念”互构视角下中国放射性废物治理筹资的行动逻辑与优化路径研究 |
| Research on the Action Logic and Optimization Path of China's Radioactive Waste Governance Financing from the Perspective of “Structure-Belief” Interconstruction |
| 投稿时间：2025-11-14 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 放射性废物治理 筹资政策 政策网络 倡导联盟框架 “结构—信念”互构 《原子能法》 |
| English Keywords:radioactive waste governance financing policy policy network Advocacy Coalition Framework “structure-belief” interconstruction the Atomic Energy Act of China ( |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 340 |
| 全文下载次数: 163 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在全球核能复兴与我国“双碳”目标背景下,放射性废物治理筹资关系到核能的可持续发展。文章从“结构—信念”互构的视角出发,运用政策网络和倡导联盟理论来分析筹资政策。研究发现,国际实践可以分为国家主导、协同治理和专业机构主导三种网络类型,效果差异主要取决于网络结构和联盟信念如何互动,封闭的网络容易引发社会争议、导致项目延滞,而开放的网络则可以依靠制度化的协商来平衡资金保障与社会认同。聚焦中国,《原子能法》确立了“党集中统一领导、多部门分工协作”的治理架构,但仍存在部门协同不足、公众参与有限等实际问题。为此,文章提出阶梯式的优化路径:短期内建立高层协调与公众监督机制；中期搭建政策学习平台并引入市场机制；长期培育责任共担的治理文化,最终建立一个既有战略定力、又具备社会韧性,且符合代际公平要求的筹资体系,从而支撑核能行业的可持续发展。 |
| English Summary: |
| Against the backdrop of the global nuclear energy revival and China's “dual carbon” targets, financing for radioactive waste management is crucial for the sustainable development of nuclear energy. This paper adopts a “structure-belief” interconstruction perspective and applies policy network and advocacy coalition theories to analyze financing policies. The study finds that international practices can be categorized into three network types:state-led, collaborative governance, and professional institution-dominated, and their effectiveness varies depending on how network structures and coalition beliefs interact. Closed networks tend to trigger social controversies and cause project delays, while open networks can balance financing security and social acceptance through institutionalized negotiation. Focusing on China, the Atomic Energy Act establishes a governance framework of “centralized and unified leadership of the Party, with multi-departmental division of labor and cooperation.” However, practical issues such as insufficient inter-departmental coordination and limited public participation remain. Accordingly, this paper proposes a stepwise optimization path:in the short term, establishing high-level coordination and public oversight mechanisms; in the medium term, building policy learning platforms and introducing market mechanisms; and in the long term, fostering a governance culture of shared responsibility. The aim is to ultimately establish a funding system that demonstrates both strategic resolve and social resilience, meets intergenerational equity requirements, and thereby supports the sustainable development of the nuclear energy industry. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|