“人机亲密”及其风险批判
“Human-Machine Intimacy”and Critical Analysis of Its Risks
投稿时间:2025-10-27  修订日期:2025-11-16
DOI:
中文关键词:  人机亲密  智能聊天机器人  亲密关系  风险规避
English Keywords:human-machine intimacy  intelligent chatbots  intimate relationships  risk mitigation
Fund Project:
作者单位邮编
邹平林 南华大学 马克思主义学院 421001
陈配*  
摘要点击次数: 60
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      人机交互演进中逐步发展出“人机亲密”,成为人类亲密关系中一种盛行的形态。“人机亲密”的产生与盛行具有深刻的社会现实基础:社会关系原子化造成的人际疏离,催生了寻求替代性亲密关系的迫切心理需求,为“人机亲密”提供了广泛的主观动机;资本逻辑向情感领域的成功渗透,开辟了情感商品化的广阔利润空间,为“人机亲密”提供了强劲的客观动力;而生成式人工智能的持续发展与重大突破,则为“人机亲密”提供了有效的技术支撑。“人机亲密”表面上满足了当代人对亲密关系的社会想象与渴望,弥补了现代社会的情感缺憾,但实际上无助于人们的心智健全,反而悄然侵蚀个体主体性,加剧社会交往异化,威胁社会整体和谐。面向未来,应该在承认技术中介化的前提下,正视“人机共生”的生存境遇,从推动立法、技术设计、促进交往与观念引导四重视角来规避“人机亲密”的潜在风险。
English Summary:
      The evolution of human-computer interaction has gradually given rise to “human-machine intimacy”, which has become a prevalent form of intimate relationship among humans. The emergence and prevalence of “human-machine intimacy” are grounded in profound social realities: the interpersonal alienation resulting from the atomization of social relations has created an urgent psychological need for alternative intimate relationships, providing a broad subjective motivation for “human-machine intimacy”; the successful penetration of capitalist logic into the emotional sphere has opened up vast profit opportunities through the commodification of emotions, supplying a powerful objective impetus for “human-machine intimacy”; and the continuous development and major breakthroughs in generative artificial intelligence technology have provided effective technical support for “human-machine intimacy”. While “human-machine intimacy” superficially satisfies contemporary people’s imagination and desire for intimate relationships, compensating for the emotional deficiencies of modern society, it ultimately does little to foster sound mental development. Instead, it subtly erodes individual autonomy, exacerbates the alienation of social interactions, and threatens overall social harmony. Looking ahead, while acknowledging the technological mediation, it is essential to confront the reality of “human-machine coexistence” and mitigate the risks of “human-machine intimacy” from four perspectives: promoting legislation, refining technological design, promoting communication and interaction, and guiding public perception.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭