|
| 新《公司法》双重股东代表诉讼制度前置程序研究 |
| Research on the pre-procedure of the dual shareholder representative litigation system in the new Company Law |
| 投稿时间：2024-10-10 修订日期：2024-11-07 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 前置程序 母公司股东 母公司 不起诉说明 豁免情形 |
| English Keywords:pre-procedure shareholders of the parent company Parent company a statement of non-prosecution Exemptions |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 15 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 为应对公司集团化浪潮,保护母公司中小股东合法权益,新修订的《公司法》引入了双重股东代表诉讼制度,当全资子公司利益受损时,母公司股东可据此提起双重股东代表诉讼,但前置程序仍然沿用股东代表诉讼的相关规定。实证研究发现,双重股东代表诉讼的前置程序存在法律规定与复杂的公司结构不相匹配、过滤功能未能有效发挥和豁免情形规定粗疏单一的问题。解决问题的关键在于认识到明确母公司的诉讼地位有助于厘清双重股东代表诉讼的理论逻辑,受请机构说明不起诉原因有助于前置程序过滤功能的发挥,前置程序豁免情形的细化和类型化有助于指导自由裁量。建议采用“同时、分别请求”的模式,明确母公司在前置程序的诉讼地位；建立股东请求回复制度,要求受请机构说明不起诉理由；类型化豁免情形,为法官裁判提供指引,实现同案同判。 |
| English Summary: |
| In order to cope with the wave of corporate collectivization and protect the legitimate rights and interests of minority shareholders of the parent company, the newly revised Company Law introduces a dual shareholder representative litigation system, and when the interests of a wholly-owned subsidiary are damaged, the shareholders of the parent company can file a dual shareholder representative lawsuit on this basis, but the relevant provisions of shareholder representative litigation are still used in the pre-procedure. The empirical study finds that the pre-procedure of dual shareholder representative litigation has the problems of mismatch between the legal provisions and the complex corporate structure, the failure to effectively play the filtering function, and the loose and single exemption provisions. The key to solving the problem is to realize that clarifying the litigation status of the parent company is helpful to clarify the theoretical logic of dual shareholder representative litigation, that the |
| 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|