| 邹清明,李雪榕.考虑政府补贴的双回收渠道闭环供应链差异定价研究[J].,2023,(6):52-66 |
| 考虑政府补贴的双回收渠道闭环供应链差异定价研究 |
| The Differential Pricing Decisions Considering Government Subsidy in Dual Recycling Channel Closed-loop Supply Chain |
| 投稿时间：2022-12-09 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 政府补贴 双回收渠道 闭环供应链 差异定价 |
| English Keywords:government subsidy dual recycling channel closed-loop supply chain differential pricing ( |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 469 |
| 全文下载次数: 156 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 在制造商主导的第三方回收商参与回收的双回收渠道闭环供应链中,文章研究了不同政府补贴方式下的闭环供应链差异定价,比较了制造商、零售商与第三方回收商在不同补贴方式下的最优定价、回收量与利润,分析了政府补贴强度对最优决策的影响。结论表明:政府补贴不会影响制造商与零售商的产品定价,但影响废旧产品回收价格与数量；政府同时对三方进行补贴时回收价格最高；当政府仅补贴回收者时,制造商回收价格最低,而当政府不提供补贴时,回收者双方的回收价格最低；政府补贴促进了废旧产品回收,但对回收渠道的回收数量影响有差异。政府补贴对受补贴的回收渠道影响较大；成员回收价格与回收渠道回收量对政府补贴强度的敏感度不同。 |
| English Summary: |
| In the dual recycling channel closed-loop supply chain with manufacturer-led third-party recyclers participating in recycling, the differential pricing of closed-loop supply chain under various government subsidy modes is studied. The optimal pricing, recycling quantity and profit of the manufacturer,the retailer and the third-party recycler under different subsidy modes are compared, and the influence of government subsidy intensity on optimal decision-making is analyzed. The conclusions show that:①Government subsidies will not affect the product pricing of the manufacturer and the retailer, but affect the recycling price and quantity of waste products. ②When the government subsidizes the three parties at the same time, the recycling price is the highest; when the government only subsidizes the retailer, the manufacturer's recycling price is the lowest, and when the government does not provide subsidies, the recycling price of both recyclers is the lowest. ③Government subsidies promote the recycling of waste products,and the impact on the number of recycling channels is different. Government subsidies have a greater impact on the subsidized recycling channels. ④The recycling price of members and the recycling amount of recycling channels are different in sensitivity to the intensity of government subsidies. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|