| 周洁,谭浩乾.发现漏罪或犯新罪后原减刑裁定效力之检视[J].,2023,(3):83-89 |
| 发现漏罪或犯新罪后原减刑裁定效力之检视 |
| Discrimination on the Effect of Finding an Omission or a New Crime on the Original Commutation Ruling |
| 投稿时间：2022-10-27 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 减刑裁定 效力 发现漏罪 犯新罪 刑事裁判既判力 |
| English Keywords:commutation ruled effectiveness find omitted crime new crime res judicata of criminal adjudication ( |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 232 |
| 全文下载次数: 124 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 罪犯服刑期间,做出减刑裁定后,又发现漏罪或犯新罪的,原减刑裁定是否继续有效引发了学界论争与司法实践分歧,相关司法解释对此经历了从完全否定到分情形细化认可的演变。文章通过梳理与检讨学界学说,并检索近年来引用相关司法解释的案例,发现司法实践的处理情况为严格依司法解释部分否定原减刑裁定效力；之后从罪刑法定原则、刑事裁判既判力、服刑人员积极改造的肯定及罪责刑相适应原则等角度对原减刑裁定效力进行分析,进一步得出原改变刑种的减刑裁定效力不应受漏罪、新罪影响而失效,削减刑期的减刑裁定不应受漏罪及过失新罪影响而失效,应根据罪犯故意犯的新罪轻重决定是否使其失效的结论。 |
| English Summary: |
| During the period of imprisonment, if a criminal is found to have omitted a crime or committed a new crime after making a commutation ruling, whether the original commutation ruling is still effective has triggered academic debates and disagreements in judicial practice. Relevant judicial interpretations have experienced the evolution from complete denial to detailed recognition by case. Through sorting out and reviewing academic theories, and searching the cases citing relevant judicial interpretation in recent years, it is found that the judicial practice denies the validity of the original commutation ruling strictly in accordance with the judicial interpretation part and then the principle of a legally prescribed punishment. This paper analyzes the effectiveness of the original commutation judgment from the perspectives of the res judicata of criminal adjudication, the affirmation of the positive transformation of prisoners and the principle of proportionality between crime and punishment. Furthermore, it is concluded that the effect of the commutation decision of the original change of punishment category should not be invalid due to the influence of the omission crime and the new crime, and the commutation decision of the reduction of the sentence should not be invalid due to the influence of the omission crime and the new crime of negligence. The conclusion of invalidation should be decided according to the seriousness of the new crime committed intentionally by the criminal. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|