| 程静.资本暴力、深绿色宗教与贵生思想——对《洪水之年》的生态批评解读[J].,2020,(6):115-120 |
| 资本暴力、深绿色宗教与贵生思想——对《洪水之年》的生态批评解读 |
| Capital Violence, Dark Green Religion and Survivalism:An Ecological Reading of The Year of Flood |
| 投稿时间：2020-11-27 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 资本暴力 深绿色宗教 生存第一 生命的固有价值 |
| English Keywords:capital violence dark green religion survivalism the intrinsic value of life ( |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 875 |
| 全文下载次数: 354 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 阿特伍德的《洪水之年》以现实主义基调设想了未来美国“技术滥用”与“资本暴力”相结合的后人类语境,凸显了晚期资本主义生产模式与人类生存之间的张力,再现了资本主义消费文化的暴力与“公司警”统治的僵化所带来的物种灭绝与人类灭绝的生存危机。文章以生命哲学为视角,剖析了小说中的环保主义宗教组织“神之园丁”对传统基督教原教旨主义生态观的调整与矫正,指出小说借“亚当第一”的布道与园丁们的生态实践,批判晚期资本主义唯利是图与戕害生命的僵化本质。文章认为,小说颠覆了原教旨主义所奉行的人类中心主义价值准则,写出了深绿色宗教的实施路径与内在机制,引导读者以“生存第一”和“敬畏生命”为原则,抵制资本暴力,尊敬所有生命的固有价值,以重返简朴、有益于生命的生活模式,保护人类与非人类生命。 |
| English Summary: |
| The Year of Flood by Margaret Atwood realistically imagines a posthuman discourse of the combination of “the abuse of technologies” and “capital violence” in future America, and by foregrounding the tension between the production mode of late capitalism and man’s survival, it represents the surviving crises for man and all the other species caused by the violence of capitalist commercialsm and the rigid governance of CorpSeCorps. This journal interprets the novel from the perspective of life philosophy and dissects the adjustment and correction of Christian fundamentalist eco-outlook, holding that Adam One’s preaching and God’s Gardeners’ ecological practice are actually a kind of criticism of the harming nature of late capitalism. It regards that the novel subverts the fundamentalists’ anthropocentrism and demonstrates the inner mechanism and practice of dark green religion, and leads readers to follow the principles of survivalism and “reverence for life”, resist capital violence, respect the intrinsic value of lives, restore the simple life-oriented lifestyle, and protect human and non-human life. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|