| 邓继好,何拳拳.夫妻一方举债案件中的当事人确定和嗣后救济[J].,2018,(3):100-107 |
| 夫妻一方举债案件中的当事人确定和嗣后救济 |
| Determination of the Parties Involved in the Debt-bearing Case of One Spouse and Subsequent Relief |
| 投稿时间：2018-03-22 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 夫妻共同债务 必要共同诉讼 当事人适格 当事人追加 再审 |
| English Keywords:community debts of the couple indispensable joint action qualification for the proper party joinder of an additional party retrial |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1003 |
| 全文下载次数: 498 |
| 中文摘要: |
| “夫妻共同债务”与 “连带债务”在债务发生原因和债务履行上存在差别,对其进行诉讼时,诉讼形式应为固有的必要共同诉讼。当债权人仅起诉名义举债人一方时,可能构成诉讼被告不适格。借鉴德日诉讼要件理论,法院可以对当事人适格问题进行“职权调查”,但所采用的诉讼资料应遵循“辩论主义”。在此基础之上,应明确法院的释明权适用情形,即通过对已经参加诉讼的当事人进行释明来改变诉的不合法状态。若因法院在此审判阶段释明权适用不到位,而最终不合法的诉获得了无法顺利执行的实体判决,债权人想要获得圆满救济仅能依靠再审。 |
| English Summary: |
| There are differences in the causes of debts and the performance between “the community debts of the couple” and the “joint debt”. When lawsuits are filed against them, the litigation form should be an inherently necessary joint litigation. When a creditor sues only one nominal debtor, it may constitute a disqualification for the defendants in the proceedings. Learning from the theory of Litigation elements in Germany and Japan, the court can conduct the Functional Investigation on the issue of Qualification for the Proper Party, but the lawsuit materials should follow the Adversary Doctrine. On this basis, if the court deems that it is necessary to carry out the joinder of an additional party, the court should explain to the parties which have participated in the litigation. Only by this way can change the illegal status of the litigation. If the courts did not apply the Right of Interpretation, and thus the improper judgment was made, the only way to allow the creditor to be satisfactorily remedied is Retrial. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|