| 杨姿.托洛茨基“太初为事”与鲁迅的文艺批评观[J].,2016,17(3):82-90 |
| 托洛茨基“太初为事”与鲁迅的文艺批评观 |
|
| 投稿时间：2016-03-20 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 托洛茨基 “太初为事” 鲁迅 文艺批评 |
| English Keywords:trotsky “The occurrence is the Fact” Lu Xun literary criticism |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1082 |
| 全文下载次数: 660 |
| 中文摘要: |
| “太初为事”是托洛茨基批评形式主义学派时提出的文艺批评标准,是马克思主义文艺观的实践和反映,显示了他对文艺本质的尊重和坚持。后期鲁迅的文艺批评沿着这样的思路展开,在现代中国的革命文学建设中,提出了关于文学自由的辩证性、文学矛盾的过程性,以及文学境界的主观性的思考和判断。在文化冲突全面爆发的时代,托洛茨基把“太初为事”和“太初为词”作为马克思主义者和形式主义者的根本分歧。对鲁迅而言,区别和分野是态度的彰显,同时还必须在具体的历史问题中进一步地澄明“词”与“事”的关系。 |
| English Summary: |
| The occurrence is the Fact”was the standard of literary criticism proposed by Trotsky when he criticized the formalism school. It showed his respect to the nature of literature. “The occurrence is the Fact”is the practice and reflection of the Marxism literary criticism. Lu Xun Literary criticism followed this way in his late period. He proposed dialectic of literary freedom, the process of literature contradictory, as well as the subjective thinking and judgment of literary realm. In the era of cultural conflict explosion, Trotsky took “The occurrence is the Fact” and “The word is the All”as the fundamental differences of Marxist and formalist. For Lu Xun, the difference and distinction was the attitude towards literature, and at the same time the relationship of “words” and “facts” should be further clarified in the specific historical issues. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|