| 张祥宇.行政犯法律性质的定位、缺陷及完善[J].,2016,17(2):91-96 |
| 行政犯法律性质的定位、缺陷及完善 |
| The Position,Defects and Improvement of Legal Nature in administrative offense |
| 投稿时间：2015-12-28 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 行政犯 法定犯 法律性质 |
| English Keywords:administrative crine naturla crime legal nature |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1040 |
| 全文下载次数: 825 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 行政犯与传统自然犯最主要的区别在于其涉及行政规制与刑法规制的交叉地带。从行政犯的构成要件与法律责任上讲,其研究的内容为行政犯罪与刑事责任,其规制的方式应当定位于刑事规制。目前,我国行政犯理论研究尚存较大的缺陷,刑法中主要以空白罪状的形式规定行政犯,对其认定需要结合相关行政法法规。这样的情况导致司法实践中认定行政犯时会出现违反罪刑法定原则的情况,而解决这样的缺陷的一个有效的手段就是将模糊的法律规定明确化。这种措施既有利于对行政犯的司法适用,也促进良好的行政规则与刑法规制之间的衔接。 |
| English Summary: |
| The main difference of the administrative crime and the traditional natural crime lies in its cross areas involving administrative regulation to criminal law regulation.Made from the constitutive requirements of administrative crime and its legal responsibility,the content of its research is the administrative crime and criminal responsibility,the way of its regulation should be determined to criminal regulation.At present, more defect in exists the theory of administrative crime, the cognizance of administrative crime need to combine with administrative rules and regulations.Such a situation leads to violate the principle of legality when identifying the administrative crime in the judicial process,however the way of solving the defect is to make vague law explicit.Such measures are conducive not only to the judicial application of administrative offense,but also to promoting good convergence between administrative rules and criminal regulation. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|