| 樊崇义,李思远.刑事证据新分类:客观性证据与主观性证据[J].,2016,17(1):84-88 |
| 刑事证据新分类:客观性证据与主观性证据 |
| The New Classification of Criminal Evidences:Objective Evidence and Subjective Evidence |
| 投稿时间：2015-10-25 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 客观性证据 主观性证据 新分类 口供中心主义 客观性证据为中心 |
| English Keywords:objective evidence subjective evidence classification objective evidence-centralism confession centralism objective evidence as the center |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1085 |
| 全文下载次数: 716 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 我国证据法学理论并没有关于客观性证据与主观性证据的分类,但根据内容的稳定性与可靠性程度的不同对我国刑诉法中的8种证据进行划分,不仅具备理论上的可行性,也具有较强的实践意义。区分客观性证据与主观性证据,能够指导办案机关扭转“口供中心主义”的做法,有利于刑事冤假错案的防范与纠正。在证据新分类的指引下,公安机关要转变口供至上的理念,客观性证据与主观性证据并重；检察机关要合理引导、深入挖掘,把紧客观性证据审查关口；审判机关要综合全案进行审查判断,发挥审判的终局作用。 |
| English Summary: |
| Presently, there is not any classification of objective evidence and subjective evidence in the theoretical field of evidence law. It is feasible that evidences could be classified into 8 kinds in accordance with the stability of content and the level of reliability. In the judicial practical area, People’s Procuratorate of Zhejiang Province has carried out pilot work of objective evidence-centered investigative model, and the Supreme Pople’s Pocuratorate has promoted twice all over the country. It has displayed evidence-classification according to above standards and has vital significance in practical area. The classification of the two kinds of evidences could guide the undertaking organs to change the action of confession- centralism, especially in the aspects of prevention and correction of wrongful convictions. Objective evidence should be the emphasis in different litigation stages by Public security organs, procuratorial organs and people’s courts, so as to realize judicial justice. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|