| 林仁博.行政权抑或司法权——试论侦查权的权属[J].,2011,12(1):61-64 |
| 行政权抑或司法权——试论侦查权的权属 |
| Investigation Power or Jurisdiction Power——The discussion on the attribute of investigation |
| 投稿时间：2010-10-28 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 侦查权 行政权 司法审查 |
| English Keywords:investigation power jurisdiction power judicial review |
| Fund Project: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 656 |
| 全文下载次数: 541 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 侦查程序在刑事诉讼审前程序中处于一种核心地位，侦查权的行使如何符合法治并有效运作是理论和实务都要面临的问题。现今我国侦查机关所采取的强制性侦查行为呈现了近乎不受控制的状态：犯罪嫌疑人的人权得不到保障，由此造成的冤假错案也是频频见报。侦查人员执法方式的粗野、原始只是这一问题的表面现象，根源在于侦查权的权属定位在理论上、立法上出现了偏差，将侦查权定位为行政权并构建司法审查制度是解决上述弊端的根本途径。 |
| English Summary: |
| The investigation procedure is the core of the precriminal procedure, the operation of the investigation power is the fact which theory and practice must tackle with.Now the compulsory investigation by public security organ was out of control. The right of the suspect can’t be proctected so there are a lot of cases of injustice. The superficial phenomenon is the detectives’ crude behaviors while the essence is the deviation of the theory and legislation. Attributing the investigation power as the administration power and establishing the judicial review system is the solution to the malpractice. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |