周峰.中美行政指导制度比较研究[J].,2010,11(2):62-65 |
中美行政指导制度比较研究 |
The Comparative Research and Enlightenment about the System of Administrative Guidance between China and America |
投稿时间:2010-02-21 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 行政指导制度 比较研究 反思 |
English Keywords:the system of administrative guidance comparative research reflection |
Fund Project: |
|
摘要点击次数: 839 |
全文下载次数: 812 |
中文摘要: |
行政指导是传统行政管理手段的一种重要补充方式,具有多样性、行政性、非强制性等特征,在行政管理中具有重要作用。在行政指导制度的发展过程中,中美行政指导制度在演进历程、立法状况、发展程度等方面具有不同特点。通过比较研究可以反思我国行政指导制度的不足,学习和借鉴美国丰富的立法和司法经验,并在行政指导的原则、立法程序、救济制度等方面加以完善,从而有利于全面推进依法行政和贯彻依法治国方略。 |
English Summary: |
Administrative guidance with the features of diversity, administrative and non-mandatory is an important complement to the traditional means of administration, and plays an important role in the administration. In the development of administrative guidance, administrative guidance system has different characteristics about evolution process, legislative status and the degree of development in China and America. We can know shortcomings about administrative guidance system in China through comparison, and learn from the successful legislative and judicial experience of America. Then we may perfect principles, legislative and relief system of administrative guidance system in order to promote administration according to law and implement the rule of law. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
关闭 |