| 谭春玲.融通与求索：关于中国本土近代史研究范式相对滞后的思考[J].,2007,8(2):43-46,50 |
| 融通与求索：关于中国本土近代史研究范式相对滞后的思考 |
| Fuse and Conside: Think of the Indigenous Paradigm of Modern History Research to China |
| 修订日期：2007-01-12 |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 近代史研究,范式,滞后,融通 |
| English Keywords:the modern history research,paradigm,lag,fuse |
| Fund Project: |
| TAN Chun-ling |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 788 |
| 全文下载次数: 1 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 美国中国近代史研究核心命题新意迭出,理论阐述的前沿特征明显,而中国本土的研究范式相对滞后。从内部看,原因在于实证研究过度化带来的负面影响、政治环境的约束、当前不良学术风气的影响和学术交流贫乏的限制。面对这种落差,我们应超越“规范”认识的束缚,培养“问题意识”;以长程的历史观解读历史,扩展宏观视野,加强对历史整体的把握;提高理论素养,提倡多学科协作研究,努力做到融通中西求索真我。 |
| English Summary: |
| The new centre proposition's of the modern history research of China in America,come forth repeatedly.These theories are always at advancing,however the indigenous paradigm of modern history research in China lagged behind American.There are lots of interior reasons,such as the positivist historiography overdone by the Chinese historian,the restriction of the political environments,the impact of the badness learning fashions at present,the limit of the barren academic exchanges.Facing these gap,we must overtake from the bondage of normal recognizantion and bring up problem's consciousness,we can explain history by using the long distance history sight and spread the macroscopic view and strengthen the control to the monolithic history,we can advance theoretical level and advocate the multidisciplinary team studies.If the Chinese research and the other's can be fused together,we can find the research's essence. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|