刘景良.科学技术即意识形态——哈贝马斯的观点及其合理性与非合理性[J].,2004,5(4):15-17,29
科学技术即意识形态——哈贝马斯的观点及其合理性与非合理性
Habemas'''' Idea and Its Reasonable and Unreasonable Sides
  修订日期:2004-07-15
DOI:
中文关键词:  哈贝马斯  科学技术即意识形态  合理性  非合理性
English Keywords:
Fund Project:
LIU Jing-liang
摘要点击次数: 786
全文下载次数: 2
中文摘要:
      哈贝马斯作为西方马克思主义法兰克福学派的第二代主要代表人物,并不是简单地复述前辈的"社会批判理论",而是沿着马尔库塞"工艺的合理性是新意识形态的内核"的思路,提出"科学技术即意识形态"的观点,用对科学技术的批判取代对资本主义社会的批判.哈贝马斯的观点有其合理性的一面,也有其非合理性的一面.把哈贝马斯的"科学技术即意识形态"观点的合理性与非合理性阐述出来,有利于促进马克思主义意识形态理论的发展.
English Summary:
      Habermas is the main representative in the second generation of western Marxist Frankfurt's faction. He didn't simply repeat others' "society animadvert theories", but is along the Marcuse's thinking way that "the rationality of the craft is the core of new ideology", put forward that "technology is ideology" and replaced the animadvert to the Capitalism society with the one to the science technical. Habermas' standpoint contained both reasonable and unreasonable sides. The anthor expounds these two sides, which will promote the marxist ideology theory.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭